recommended by Aaron Gertler
https://www.givewell.org/how-we-work/our-criteria/cost-effectiveness/comparing-moral-weights
animals differ in their cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and neurological features.
these may affect an animal's capacity for welfare (the range of how happy or sad a life can be),
and moral status, degree to which their happiness or sadness matters at all
I don't account for moral status at all, and it seems kind of arbitrary. what's it based on?
Utility functions are hard: post your utility function (less wrong)
moral standing and moral weight talk by Jason Schukraft
@jason