1 sentence of what it is
Category
Computation of the life
0
Effort/cost
Neglected
0
Number of lives affected, if it worked
0
Probability of being solved
0
Quality of life change
Scale (direct impact on creating happier lives, reducing suffering)
0
Source
from cause prioritization website
Time per life
Utility Category
Weighted Sum
0
apply AI to it?
0
notes
The following was copied from Argument Mapping - Cause Prioritization Wiki. Feel free to edit at will.
TODO describe problem (people disagree about important things, don’t change their minds often, aren’t good at crossing inferential distances e.g. see The Hanson-Yudkowsky AI-Foom Debate)
May be a good complement to Forecasting methods so that forecasters can update.
Check out argument mapping software.
Ought is a new company with a team of EA or EA-adjacent people.
“Research on the underlying models and methods he uses to resolve disagreements between individuals with large inferential gaps. He will develop lessons to transfer these to test students, and see what skills are transferred and what skills still lack.”1 I haven’t seen anything public about this so not sure what’s going on.
List people who are interested in this?